There are multiple reasons for this, but one primary reason is that a Hebrew Matthew is inconsistent with the modern two-source theory, the predominant theory of the origin of Matthew.
(The two-source theory stipulates that Matthew and Luke drew from the gospel of Mark and a second source of Jesus sayings, usually designated as "Q").
Before we address the date of writing for Matthew, I believe we do need to address the language in which it was written.The various dates most widely held as possible writing dates of the Gospel are between A. As far as dating the gospel goes, Luke was written before the book of Acts and Acts does not mention "Nero's persecution of the Christians in A. Meghan Markle's father has stayed silent since she gave birth hoping, in his own words, that becoming a mother would 'mellow' her and they could heal their rift.This can be shown by comparing Mark , which says: But when you see the abomination of desolation standing where it should not be (let the reader understand), then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains with Matt -16: Therefore when you see the abomination of desolation which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains. D.), bishop of Hierapolis, wrote that Matthew collected the oracles in the Hebrew language, and each interpreted them as best he could.Here both books interrupt a speech by Jesus in the same place, to make the same side note to the reader let the reader understand. Early Christian witnesses indicate that Matthew was the first gospel written, and that it was originally written in Hebrew. This witness by Papias has been treated quite roughly, as modern writers first have assumed he meant Aramaic when he said Hebrew, and then rejected his comment anyway.